JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 20, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Serrato Serrato Luz Amparo·Respondent American Vig Ltda

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud Nulidad Por Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró la nulidad de todo lo actuado dentro de la tutela presentada por la ciudadana de la referencia contra American Vig Ltda., a partir del auto proferido por el Juzgado 14 de Familia de Bogotá, toda vez que este despacho judicial es quien debe conocer y tramitar el proceso.

En consecuencia, se ordenó remitir el expediente de la referencia al mencionado juzgado para que realice el trámite que corresponda conforme a la ley.

Una vez cumplido lo anterior, regrese el expediente a la Corte Constitucional para su eventual revisión.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declarar la nulidad de todo lo actuado dentro de la acción de tutela presentada por Luz Amparo Serrato Serrato contra American Vig Ltda., a partir del auto proferido por el Juzgado 14 de Familia de Bogotá el 22 de diciembre de 2000 (folio 17 del expediente).
  2. Segundo. REMITASE el expediente de la referencia al Juzgado 14 de Familia de Bogotá para que, en forma inmediata, le imprima a esta acción de tutela el trámite que corresponda conforme a la ley.
  3. Tercero. Una vez cumplido lo anterior, regrese el expediente a la Corte Constitucional para su eventual revisión.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.